We're sorry, but OSHAcademy doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript or install a browser that supports Javascript.

700 Introduction to Safety Management
Skip to main content

Don't Take a Reactive Approach to Safety

Some employers think they can gamble on safety strategies that ignore hazards until they cause an accident. Operating on the basic assumption that "it's not a problem, until it's a problem," these employers employ a reactive strategy that merely 'puts out fires' as they arise.

Image of two firefighters using a hose to spray water
Isn't it always more expensive to build a house after it burns down?

Another way to think about a reactive approach to safety is that it's like using your car's rear-view mirror to stay in the right lane while driving. By the time you realize you've veered out of the lane, it's already too late.

Employers who adopt a reactive approach to safety often operate under faulty assumptions. Examples include:

  • accidents just happen,
  • there's not much that can be done about it, and
  • accident costs are just the costs of doing business.

Assumptions like the ones mentioned above invariably lead to increased short-term safety costs. Why is that? Because, besides the expenses incurred for corrective actions, employers also face significant direct and indirect costs from accidents. After all, isn't rebuilding a burnt-down house always more expensive?

  • Accident investigations are conducted to place blame — never uncover root causes.
  • Early return to work programs activate after an accident.
  • "Accident-Free-Days" incentive programs that actually reward employees for not reporting accidents.

Knowledge Check Choose the best answer for the question.

1-9. Which of the following strategies costs more in the short term?